Legal Opinion

Damiano v. Mooney

Pennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County

Decided July 17, 1934Published

1Opinion of the Court

Rosen, J.,

This is a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.

The plaintiff brought this action against the defendant on a bond executed by her in connection with an appeal from the judgment of a magistrate obtained by the plaintiff against one Joseph Delpizzo. The condition of the bond reads as follows: “I, Annie Mooney, hold myself indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $184, conditioned for Joseph Delpizzo all costs that have or may accrue in this case up to the final determination of this suit, and that the defendant will prosecute his appeal with effect.”

The appeal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. County of Schuylkill v. CopleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  2. Lentz v. Kittanning Real Estate Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Commonwealth v. Wistar, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1891
  4. Stauffer Stauffer v. GebhardtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Morgan v. SoissonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API