Legal Opinion

Heckscher v. Edenborn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 12, 1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, William- Edenborn*, from a judgment of the Supreme'Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Suffolk on the 2d day of March, 1907, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial held by consent at the Queens and Kings County Trial Terms, a jury having been waived.

1Opinion of the Court

Woodward, J.:

This is an action at law, tried by the court, a jury having been waived, to recover, as moneys had and received, the amounts paid by the plaintiff and his assignors for certain stock in the Sheffield Coal and Iron Company in pursuance of their subscriptions to.a syndicate agreement which they claim to have rescinded. The learned trial court has made ninety-six findings of fact and twenty conclusions of law, sustaining the plaintiff’s contention, and awarding judgment for the full amount claimed. The defendant excepts *255to certain of the findings of fact and to all of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of of N.Y., L. W.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. People v. . BloomNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Mack v. . LattaNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Getty v. . DevlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. Brewster v. . HatchNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Edenborn v. SimCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
  2. Heckscher v. EdenbornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  3. Heckscher v. EdenbornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API