Legal Opinion

Louisville N. R. Co. v. Echols

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 15, 1925No. 8 Div. 784PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

The appellant made a motion in the circuit court under section 5861 of the Code of 1907, which provides:

“Judgments may be set off against each other by a court of record on motion.”

The motion was overruled without more in the way of a judgment.

In the ease of Ex parte Lehman, Durr & Co., 59 Ala. 631, this question was involved, and the statute was there considered, and the court issued the rule nisi and awarded a mandamus instructing the trial court to vacate the order disallowing the set-off, thus in effect holding that such an order would not support an appeal, for the reason that mandamus…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex parte LehmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  2. L. & N. R. R. v. PerkinsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Ex parte HuntSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hamrick v. Town of AlbertvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API