Legal Opinion

Mei Yun Chen v. Mei Wan Kao

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 18, 2012PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In order to obtain the remedy of a constructive trust, a plaintiff generally is required to demonstrate four factors: (1) a fiduciary or confidential relationship between the parties, (2) a promise, (3) a transfer of some asset in reliance upon the promise, and (4) unjust enrichment flowing from the breach of the promise (see McGrath v Hilding, 41 NY2d 625, 629 [1977]; Sharp v Kosmalski, 40 NY2d 119, 121 [1976]). To achieve equity and avoid unjust enrichment, the courts apply these factors flexibly rather than rigidly (see Simonds v Simonds, 45 NY2d 233, 241 [1978]; Moak v Raynor, 28 AD3d…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sharp v. KosmalskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Simonds v. SimondsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Ball v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Moak v. RaynorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Byrd v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Canzona v. AtanasioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Tyree v. HennAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Canas v. OshiroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  4. Kalmon Dolgin Affiliates, Inc. v. TonacchioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. Berry v. WallersteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API