Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Insurance Co. v. Semmer Electric, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 21, 1988No. 88-2477PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We agree with the appellant’s contention that the circuit court erred in awarding attorney’s fees to the appellee pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1985). “Attorney’s fees may only be awarded pursuant to that statute when the action brought or the defense raised is so clearly devoid of merit both on the facts and the law as to be completely untenable.” Brinson v. Creative Aluminum Products, 519 So.2d 59, 60 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1988).

Here, a summary judgment was rendered in favor of the appellee showing that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the appellee was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Whitten v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1982
  2. Brinson v. Creative Aluminum Products, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chaiken v. SuchmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Rojas v. DrakeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Ware v. Land Title Co. of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API