Legal Opinion

Perry v. Delisle

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided November 30, 2004No. Record 0439-04-1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENTON, Judge.

The Workers’ Compensation Commission ruled that Tom Delisle, trading as R & T Construction, sustained his burden of proving he regularly employs fewer than three people. Melvin G. Perry contends the commission erred in concluding that Delisle was not within the coverage of the Act and, therefore, in ruling Perry’s injury by accident was not compensable. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the commission’s decision.

*419I.

The essential facts are not contested. The commission found that Melvin G. Perry suffered an injury on April 4, 2001 while he was employed by R & T Construction.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bass v. City of Richmond Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
  2. Intermodal Services, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  3. Craddock Moving & Storage Co. v. SettlesCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
  4. Cotman v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
  5. City of Norfolk v. BennettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Perry v. DelisleCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
  2. Perry v. DelisleCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
  3. Perry v. DelisleCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API