Legal Opinion

Cellco Partnership v. City of Elkhart Board of Zoning Appeals

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided February 7, 2025No. 3:23-cv-00913Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:23cv913 DRL CITY OF ELKHART BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER The court granted summary judgment to petitioner Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless. It found the Elkhart Board of Zoning Appeals violated the “in writing” requirement of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (TCA), 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B)(iii), when the BZA denied, without articulating reasons for its decision, a petition for a use variance to situate a 135-foot…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API