Weeaks v. State

ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

DICE, Judge.

Appellant, in his motion for rehearing, in support of his contention that the allegations of the indictment were insufficient to show that the district court of Kendall County had jurisdiction over the proceedings in which it was charged the perjury was committed, emphasizes the misspelling of the word “defraud” in the allegation describing the offense with which he was charged.

The indictment alleged that appellant was duly and legally charged by indictment “with having obtained money, goods, with intent to degraud, by giving, drawing check,…