O'Brien v. Public Service Company
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
Blandin J.
There was evidence upon which reasonable men could find that the sole cause of the accident was the defendant’s negligence and in the absence of any error affecting the result the verdict must be upheld. See Riley v. Bank, 86 N. H. 329, 330; Mason v. Andrews, 86 N. H. 277. If a reading of the record might lead this court to an opposite conclusion upon the question of fact from the one reached by the jury, that is no sufficient reason for us to usurp their functions. Employers Assurance Co. v. Sweatt, ante, 31, and cases cited.
Upon the evidence most favorable to the plaintiff it…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McCarthy v. SoutherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
- Brown v. MailhotSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
- Colby v. LeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
- Dane v. MacGregorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
- MacKelvie v. RiceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Lincoln v. TarbellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1953
- Fulford v. Burndy Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1985
- Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974