Dillard v. Harden
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
In a suit filed April 23, 1937, appellant, Dillard, prayed the restoration of an alleged lost deed, and from a decree denying that relief is this appeal. In an excellent opinion prepared 'by the chancellor denying that relief the court correctly declared the law to be that “To establish a lost deed, evidence of the execution must be clear, concise and satisfactory.” The chancellor, being of the opinion that the testimony did not measure up to that high standard, denied the relief prayed
Now, while it is true, as said by the court below, that the testimony must be “clear, concise and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carpenter v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Hospital & Benevolent Ass'n v. Arkansas Baptist State ConventionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Jacks v. WootenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
3Cited by4 opinions
- McCulloch v. McCullochSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Schwartz v. HardwickeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
- Baer v. ColemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
- Martin v. NathanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951