Legal Opinion

Dillard v. Harden

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 23, 1939No. 4-5334PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

In a suit filed April 23, 1937, appellant, Dillard, prayed the restoration of an alleged lost deed, and from a decree denying that relief is this appeal. In an excellent opinion prepared 'by the chancellor denying that relief the court correctly declared the law to be that “To establish a lost deed, evidence of the execution must be clear, concise and satisfactory.” The chancellor, being of the opinion that the testimony did not measure up to that high standard, denied the relief prayed

Now, while it is true, as said by the court below, that the testimony must be “clear, concise and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  2. Hospital & Benevolent Ass'n v. Arkansas Baptist State ConventionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  3. Jacks v. WootenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCulloch v. McCullochSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  2. Schwartz v. HardwickeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  3. Baer v. ColemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  4. Martin v. NathanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API