Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Goldman v. Garofalo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 23, 1979Published

1Concurrence

Suozzi, J. P.,

concurs in so much of the result as denies plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment, but otherwise dissents and votes to deny defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment and to grant plaintiff’s motion for class action certification, in accordance with the following memorandum: The complaint seeks to recover fees paid by plaintiff and other members of the purported class for Pap smear tests performed by defendants during a period of time (more than two years) when the defendant laboratory did not have a valid State permit as required by section 574 of the Public Health…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Goldman v. GarofaloNew York Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API