Legal Opinion

Perry v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 2, 1913No. 4692PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Indictment for cheating and swindling; from Toombs superior court—Judge Rawlings. December 21, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

Where a motion for a new trial is filed during the term, and an order entered setting down the hearing of the motion for a named day in vacation, that day, relatively to the hearing of the motion, is, in legal contemplation, a continuance of the term at which the order was entered. When that day arrives, the court has jurisdiction to hear the motion, or to continue it to any other day by express order. If not so heard or reset, the motion goes over to the next term of the court. Where no term order is taken, jurisdiction over the motion is ' derived from the statute. Sections- 4852 and 4853…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. StricklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Napier v. HeilkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Lott v. Wood & BrotherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  4. Glenn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Miller v. ThigpenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Flury v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  2. Perry v. GammageCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  3. Tanner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Browder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API