Legal Opinion

Bowers v. Cain

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 18, 1992No. 91-3282PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is from a summary judgment for the appellee in a slip and fall injury action. The trial court found that there was no proof of the existence of a dangerous condition nor that the landowner had actual or constructive knowledge of the condition. We find that the facts taken most favorably to appellant as the non-moving party are in dispute and that it was error to enter summary judgment.

Appellant fractured her ankle when she slipped on a stairway at appellee’s apartment complex while she was lawfully on the premises. In her complaint, appellant alleged that the stairs were unsafe…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cassel v. PriceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Haynes v. LloydDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Daniel v. RogersSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  4. 194th St. Hotel Corp. v. HopfDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. VANTRAN INDUSTRIES v. Ryder Truck RentalDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  2. Briguera v. Behr Paint Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API