Legal Opinion

Hyatt v. McBurney

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 17, 1882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal from a final judgment upon the ground that this appellant had given notice of appeal from an intermediate decree in the cause, but had failed to perfect his appeal, thereby waiving it.

Read the full summary

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal from a final judgment upon the ground that this appellant had given notice of appeal from an intermediate decree in the cause, but had failed to perfect his appeal, thereby waiving it. The notice which was claimed to be the notice of appeal from the intermediate decree was as follows : “ The defendant, Caroline Carson, excepts for the purpose of an appeal to the Supreme Court to so much of the decree of his Honor Judge Pressley as decides that the plaintiff has a valid mortgage on the property mentioned in the pleadings, or any lien thereon superior to…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Simpson.

In this case the plaintiff respondent instituted an action to foreclose a mortgage covering a tract of land in Charleston county claimed by the defendant Mrs. Caroline Carson by virtue of an alleged older mortgage and a sale thereunder through proceedings in the United States Court. The case was heard first by Judge Pressley in April, 1880. The main question at that hearing was whether the mortgage under which Mrs. Carson claimed had been satisfied.

This question had previously been made in the United States Court as between…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Montgomery & Crawford, Inc. v. Arcadia MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  2. Bodie v. Char. & West. Car. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API