Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ray v. Blue Alliance Mutual Insurance

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 6, 1991Published

1DissentCollins, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

We review directly the decision of the District Court, here sitting as the Small Claims Court. Cf. City of Portland v. Gemini Concerts, Inc., 481 A.2d 180, 181 (Me.1984). Because I cannot conclude on this record that the District Court misapplied the law,1 I would vacate the Superior Court’s decision and reinstate the judgment in favor of the Rays.

The Small Claims Court was obligated to construe the terms of the insurance policy as a matter of law, and to construe any ambiguities strictly against the insurer. See Baybutt Constr. Co. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co., 455…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baybutt Construction Corp. v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  2. City of Portland v. Gemini Concerts, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  3. Commissioner of Human Services v. LevesqueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API