Legal Opinion

Simonson v. Z Cranbury Associates

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 4, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue on this appeal is whether, in a foreclosure action brought by a mortgagee on a non-recourse purchase-money mortgage, the defaulting mortgagor is entitled to enforce a release provision covering a portion of the mortgaged property.

The subject property is a 249 acre farm in Cranbury, New Jersey. After the developer-mortgagor, Cranbury Associates, L.P. (Cranbury), had paid $180,000 in option payments to secure the right to purchase the property, owned by mortgagee Edward Simonson (Simonson),1 Cranbury exercised its right to purchase the property. Cranbury paid ten percent of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  3. Borough of West Caldwell v. Borough of CaldwellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  4. Krosnowski v. KrosnowskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  5. Avery v. WysockiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kolbe v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  2. Salt Lake Tribune Publishing Co. v. Management Planning, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. v. Celltrion Healthcare Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  4. Davis v. Devereux FoundationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API