Legal Opinion

Radosta v. Garon

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 1980No. 10344PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LEMMON, Judge.

Defendants have appealed from a partial summary judgment which declared invalid a contract they had executed with plaintiff and prohibited them from acting as trustees under the contract.1 The issue on appeal is the validity of the contract.

I

Prior to the execution of the contract at issue, plaintiff was the owner of 50% of the shares of stock in Pascal-Manale, Inc., and defendants Garon and Carimi were the attorney and accountant respectively for the corporation. Plaintiff had contracted to purchase the other 50% of the stock from her sister for the price of $450,000.00, but had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. D'AMICO v. CanizaroSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
  2. Chappuis v. SpencerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  3. Emile M. Babst Co., Inc. v. Commercial Enterprises, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1973

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. De Felice v. GaronSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API