Legal Opinion

State v. Harrison

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 2, 1990No. Nos. 2 CA-CR 89-0499, 2 CA-CR 90-0281-PRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

This is an appeal of a conviction consolidated with a petition for review of the summary disposition of a petition for post-conviction relief under Rule 32, Ariz.R. Crim.Proc., 17 A.R.S., on the basis of ineffective counsel. We are asked to find, as a matter of first impression, that when a legal defender has been adjudicated ineffective in a prior unrelated proceeding, a subsequent appointment of another legal defender for the same defendant is per se a conflict of interest. Because we cannot substantiate that such a situation is a conflict of interest or that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McDougall v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. AdamsonArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. WattonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Rodriguez v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. MichaelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. SustaitaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API