Legal Opinion

Kwame O. E'tief, Sr. v. Tamara M. Ogier

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 25, 2006No. 05-15005Unpublished

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Kwame O. E’tief, Sr., a Chapter 7 debt- or proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s order approving the Trustee’s Application to Compromise a malpractice claim against E’tiefs former counsel, G. Alfred Brunavs. On appeal, E’tief argues that the Trustee and Brunavs colluded with each other to dissolve Brunavs of legal liabilities to E’tiefs detriment. In making this argument, E’tief relies on oth er bankruptcy rulings as evidence of Brunavs’s collusion with the Trustee and also suggests these other rulings illustrate the bankruptcy judge’s bias…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re: Optical Technologies, Inc. v. Larson Pharmacy Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  2. Barrett Dodge Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. CranshawCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  3. Enron Corp. v. The New Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  4. George N. Abood v. John R. Block, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API