Lee v. GEICO Indemnity Co.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
*701BRENNAN, J.
¶ 1. GEICO Indemnity Company and Ceree King (unless otherwise noted collectively referred to as GEICO) appeal from the trial court's amended judgment imposing sanctions for: (1) GEICO's breach of the Civil Division Scheduling Order; and (2) GEICO's filing of Motions After Verdict in which GEICO sought relief from the sanction previously imposed for violating the trial court's scheduling order. With regard to the former, GEICO argues that the trial court lacked the authority to sanction it for violating the scheduling order and that the sanction imposed (travel expenses) was unjust.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Johnson v. Allis Chalmers Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Industrial Roofing Services, Inc. v. MarquardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- Schultz v. SykesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- Koepsell's Olde Popcorn Wagons, Inc. v. Koepsell's Festival Popcorn Wagons, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dustardy H. v. Bethany H.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
- Krista Scudder v. Concordia University, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2025
- Lee v. GEICO Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
- Marriage of Wenzel v. WenzelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2017