Gill v. Burks
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtKnox, J.
At tlie close of the testimony in this cause the court directed a verdict against appellant, saying: ‘ ‘ Gentlemen of the July, the parties to this suit asked the court to give peremptory instructions in their behalf, so that left the case up to me to decide, . .
The bill of exceptions, signed and approved by the trial judge and included in the transcript filed here, discloses that appellant requested a peremptory instruction in his favor, and also asked an additional instruction which, if given, would have submitted to the jury for its determination one material issue of fact. Other than…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. MulkeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance v. ClickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Interstate Business Men's Accident Ass'n v. SandersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. IngramSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carter v. Ryburn Ford Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Lee Rubber & Tire Corp. v. CamfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
- Carter v. Ryburn Ford Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.