Hernandez v. K-Mart Corp.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
NESBITT, Judge.
There being an absence of any evidence to support K-Mart’s affirmative defenses of probable cause and consent, we find that the trial court erred in submitting these issues to the jury. Therefore, we reverse the judgment below.
A security guard, working for K-Mart, approached Dany Hernandez in the parking lot of the K-Mart store. At the guard’s request, she accompanied him to a room in the back of the store where she was accused of shoplifting. Though she denied the accusation, she was interrogated, threatened with police action, and strip-searched. When the K-Mart employees’…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Borenstein v. RaskinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Gatto v. Publix Supermarket, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Lee v. GeigerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Valdes v. Faby Enterprises, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Johns v. Ford Motor Credit Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
3Cited by2 opinions
- Archer v. NicholsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020
- Cameron Moore v. Jasmine ReddDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2026