Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. K-Mart Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 14, 1986No. 86-408PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NESBITT, Judge.

There being an absence of any evidence to support K-Mart’s affirmative defenses of probable cause and consent, we find that the trial court erred in submitting these issues to the jury. Therefore, we reverse the judgment below.

A security guard, working for K-Mart, approached Dany Hernandez in the parking lot of the K-Mart store. At the guard’s request, she accompanied him to a room in the back of the store where she was accused of shoplifting. Though she denied the accusation, she was interrogated, threatened with police action, and strip-searched. When the K-Mart employees’…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Borenstein v. RaskinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Gatto v. Publix Supermarket, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Lee v. GeigerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Valdes v. Faby Enterprises, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  5. Johns v. Ford Motor Credit Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Archer v. NicholsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020
  2. Cameron Moore v. Jasmine ReddDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API