Legal Opinion

German National Bank v. Studley

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1876PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: Chouteau et al. v. O. D. Filley, 50 Mo. 174 (begin on p. 177) ; State of Missouri v. Bank of Missouri, 45 Mo. 538; Pars, on Notes & Bills, 91; Story on Ag. (8th ed.) 185, sec. 147 ; Wood v. Good-ridge,'6 Cush. (Mass.) 117 ; Story on Ag. (8th ed.) 256, sec. 210; Back v. Ayman, 3 Hill (N. Y.), 262; Stiner v¿ Taylor, 3 Hill (N. Y.), 279. cited: IPars. on Notes & Bills, 108, 142.

1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.

This is a suit on a negotiable promissory note dated Chicago, July 8, 1871, for $1,000, with interest from date at 6 per cent., payable twelve months after date;to the order of R. P. Studley & Co., and indorsed “ R. P. Studley & Co.” The note is made by William H. Rice.

*261It appears that the name of R. P. Studley & Co. was-not written by R. P. Studley himself, who, at the time, was trading alone as R. P. Studley & Co., but by one Edward P. Rice, his former partner; and the defense relied upon is that Rice was not authorized to indorse the note, and that the indorsement was. made without the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bank v. Ohio Valley Furniture Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Swift & Co. v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Myers v. Walker Bros. & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API