Barish v. Carmel
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSamuel H. Hopstadter, J.
Defendants Carmel and Smart-craft Corporation move pursuant to section 96 of the Civil Practice Act for an order severing the first cause of action alleged against the individual defendants from the second cause of action alleged against the corporate defendant. The first cause is based oh a series of transactions with the individual defendants accompanied by false and fraudulent representations by which those defendants acquired from the plaintiff’s assignors certain notes and stock. All of the individuals involved are *79directly concerned with the affairs of the defendant corporation. One of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gerseta Corp. v. Silk Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
3Cited by2 opinions
- Barish v. CarmelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Barish v. CarmelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962