Harris v. the State

BARNES, Presiding Judge.

Following the denial of his motion for new trial, Haniyf A. Harris appeals his armed robbery conviction and contends that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction, and that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the photographic lineup and in admitting similar transaction evidence. Following our review and discerning no reversible error, we affirm.

1. Harris first challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his armed robbery conviction. On appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the…