Legal Opinion

In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 21, 2018No. 18-1464PPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAYATTA, Circuit Judge.

The Rhode Island Department of Labor and Training ("Department") petitions us for a writ of advisory mandamus to answer the following question: May a state government successfully invoke the attorney-client privilege in response to a federal grand jury subpoena? The petition comes in response to a holding by a federal district court in the District of Rhode Island that the privilege is categorically unavailable to a state government in receipt of a federal grand jury subpoena. For the reasons discussed below, we grant the writ and explain why such a categorical rule is…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clark v. QG Printing II, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  2. In Re: Da Graca v.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  3. In Re: Raimondo v.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  4. In re SealedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
  5. Sandra Munoz v. United States Department of StateDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API