In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KAYATTA, Circuit Judge.
The Rhode Island Department of Labor and Training ("Department") petitions us for a writ of advisory mandamus to answer the following question: May a state government successfully invoke the attorney-client privilege in response to a federal grand jury subpoena? The petition comes in response to a holding by a federal district court in the District of Rhode Island that the privilege is categorically unavailable to a state government in receipt of a federal grand jury subpoena. For the reasons discussed below, we grant the writ and explain why such a categorical rule is…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clark v. QG Printing II, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- In Re: Da Graca v.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- In Re: Raimondo v.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- In re SealedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
- Sandra Munoz v. United States Department of StateDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021