Meeth v. Rankin Brick Co.

Opinion of the Court, the

Hon. George W. Wall, Judge.

The appellant brought assumpsit against the appellee to recover for personal services rendered in superintending certain, building operations conducted by the appellee; also for the use of his team and for money advanced by him for benefit of appellee.

It was denied by appellee that appellant performed any services as alleged, or that he made such advances, and it was claimed that in the transactions referred to, he was really carrying on the operations for himself, though the contracts were in the name of the appellee; that the brick used in…