Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tusant v. City of Des Moines

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 18, 1941No. 45761Published

1DissentStiger, J.

(dissenting) — I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion which is accomplished by judicial legislation.

The title to the Soldiers’ Preference Law, chapter 9, 30th General Assembly, reads:

“An Act regulating appointments, employment, and removals in the public departments and upon public works in Ihe state of Iowa, and the counties, cities and towns thereof.”

Sections 1159 and 1163, Code, 1939, read in part as follows :

“1159 * " * In every public department and upon all public works in the state, * * * honorably discharged soldiers * * * shall, except in the position of school teachers, be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Fonda v. . MortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Shaw v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. People Ex Rel. Jacobus v. . Van WyckNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Hahn v. Clayton CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  5. Babcock v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API