Legal Opinion

Pride v. New York State Department of Correctional Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 5, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1004We affirm. Our review of a determination denying a prison grievance is limited to whether it was irrational or arbitrary and capricious (see Matter of Abreu v Fischer, 87 AD3d 1213 [2011]; Matter of Hernandez v Fischer, 79 AD3d 1544, 1546 [2010], lv denied 16 NY3d 710 [2011]).* Here, the record demonstrates that petitioner’s complaints were investigated thoroughly by the deputy superintendent of programs, and all of the statements made in the August 2009 memorandum were amply supported by documentation. Similarly, based upon petitioner’s records that reflect that he has failed to successfully…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Abreu v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Hernandez v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Lugo v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Rivera v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Salahuddin v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brooks v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Matter of Johnson v. AnnucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. Brooks v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API