Legal Opinion

Torcik v. Chase Manhattan Bank, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 7, 2006No. 05-5144Published

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-Appellant pro se Petr Torcik appeals from a September 7, 2005, judg*26ment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Block, J.) granting summary judgment to defendant. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, the procedural history, and the scope of the issues presented on appeal.

Torcik brought suit against Chase Manhattan Bank (“Chase”), asserting claims of negligence and tortious interference with contract. In March, 1999, Vladamir Stepanik entered into a contract with CityNet, Ltd. (“CityNet”), a Czech Corporation. Torcik was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tenenbaum v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  2. Kronos, Inc. v. AVX Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Johnson v. Bryco ArmsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
  4. Stone v. Courtyard Management Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API