Legal Opinion

Exley v. Village of Endicott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 17, 1980Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Mahoney, P. J.

The facts are largely undisputed. At some point in 1978 the corporate petitioner, which sells interconnect telephone systems in competition with the New York Telephone Company (NYT), learned that the Village of Endicott was going to replace its existing telephone system. Petitioner requested that it be permitted to submit a bid. The village, without developing specifications or advertising for bids, signed a contract with NYT for installation and service, of a "Dimension” PBX telephone system pursuant to a two-tier rate contract. Under the two-tier approach…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. CareyNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Gerzof v. SweeneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Tele/Resources, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. CareyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API