Legal Opinion
Hilco, Inc. v. Lenentine
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 14, 1997No. 96-119PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
The defendants, Halston and Janet Lenentine, appeal the Superior Court’s (Groff, J.) order subordinating their mortgage to the mortgages held by the plaintiffs, Hilco, Inc. (Hilco) and Diversified Financial Systems, Inc. (Diversified). We reverse and remand.
The trial court found the following facts. In May 1985, Halston Lenentine entered into an agreement to sell certain real estate in Tilton to Ronald C. Mizner. Mizner obtained financing from the Lenentines and a guaranteed loan from the Small Business Administration. After closing, Meredith Bank and Trust Company (Meredith Bank) recorded a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Amoskeag Bank v. ChagnonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- Anatole Caron, Inc. v. Manchester Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940
- Decker v. DeckerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Laconia Savings Bank v. VittumSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902
3Cited by7 opinions
- Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2011
- Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC, Appellant v. Town of Bartlett, AppelleeDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2021
- Bank of America, N.A. v. Citizens BankDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2015
- DeMauro v. DeMauroSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- Green Tree Servicing v. USA, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.