Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
Honorable R. H. Cory, Chairman State Affairs Committee House of Representatives Austin, Texas Opinion No. W-612 Re: Constltutionallty of House Bill 42 of the 56th Leg., the Psycho- logist Certification Dear Mr. Cory: Act. You have requested our opinion on the validity of Rouse Bill 42 of the 56th Legislature, calling particular attention to whether its provisions are so vague, indefinite and uncertain as to be incapable of interpretation or of being enforced and whether Its provisions violate the pre- ference provision of Section 31 of Article XVI of the Constitution of Texas. Section 2 of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
- Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1905
- Schlichting v. Texas State Board of Medical ExaminersTexas Supreme Court · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.