Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Gardens of Connemara Ltd. and Emerson Farm Company, Ltd. v. Longhorn Creek Ltd.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 2026No. 24-0271Published

1Concurrence

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 24-0271 ══════════ Gardens of Connemara Ltd. and Emerson Farm Company, Ltd., Petitioners, v. Longhorn Creek Ltd., Respondent ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas ═══════════════════════════════════════ JUSTICE YOUNG, concurring in the denial of the petition for review. This case raises the important question of when a trial court must consider pleading exhibits appended to a petition in ruling on a Rule 91a motion to dismiss. The answer depends on yet another question:…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Jernigan v. LangleyTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Shields Ltd. Partnership v. BradberryTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Cash America International Inc. v. BennettTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. United States v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API