Baur v. Williams

Opinion delivered May 17, 1873, by

Mercur, J.

Baur & Miller, for the use of Miller, obtained a judgment against Williams. Miller assigned it to Shoemaker, who issued execution thereon. After levy upon personal property, but before sale, Bailie commenced a suit by attachment, under the act of March 17,1869, against Baur & Miller, and served Williams as garnishee. The same day a rule was granted to show cause why the execution issued on the judgment should not be stayed until the attachment suit was determined. Upon the hearing, Shoemaker claimed the money; but the defendant answered that the…