State Ex Rel. State Building Commision v. Smith
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.
— Original proceeding in mandamus. Eelators seek to compel the State Auditor to register certain bonds. The ease1 was submitted on the pleadings, and the facts may be stated as follows:
An amendment to the Constitution was submitted to the qualified voters of the State by a resolution of the General Assembly. [Laws 1933-4, Ex. Sess., p. 174.] At the election it was approved by a majority of 121,588. The pertinent parts of the amendment follow:
‘ The General Assembly shall have power to authorize the contracting of a debt . ■. . on behalf of the State and to issue bonds . . . not exceeding in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Grandy v. CaseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- Fahey v. HackmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
- State Ex Rel. William R. Compton Co. v. WalterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- In Re Poindexter v. Pettis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
3Cited by16 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Board of Fund Commissioners v. HolmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Whiteside v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- State Ex Rel. Morgan v. O'BrienWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1948
- Busch v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Doody v. State Ex Rel. Mobile CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.