Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. State Building Commision v. Smith

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided August 13, 1934PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.

— Original proceeding in mandamus. Eelators seek to compel the State Auditor to register certain bonds. The ease1 was submitted on the pleadings, and the facts may be stated as follows:

An amendment to the Constitution was submitted to the qualified voters of the State by a resolution of the General Assembly. [Laws 1933-4, Ex. Sess., p. 174.] At the election it was approved by a majority of 121,588. The pertinent parts of the amendment follow:

‘ The General Assembly shall have power to authorize the contracting of a debt . ■. . on behalf of the State and to issue bonds . . . not exceeding in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grandy v. CaseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  2. Fahey v. HackmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  3. State Ex Rel. William R. Compton Co. v. WalterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  4. In Re Poindexter v. Pettis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1922

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Board of Fund Commissioners v. HolmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. Whiteside v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  3. State Ex Rel. Morgan v. O'BrienWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Busch v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Doody v. State Ex Rel. Mobile CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API