Legal Opinion
Weiner v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 31, 2012No. 96PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question not answered as unnecessary.
Plaintiff Mark Weiner, who was employed by the New York City Fire Department as an emergency medical technician, was hurt while responding to a report of an injured person on a boardwalk in Brighton Beach. He applied for and received workers’ compensation benefits from his employer—the City of New York. Subsequently, Weiner commenced this action against the City and its Parks and Recreation Department, alleging both common-law negligence and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Billy v. Consolidated Machine Tool Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Gonzales v. Armac Industries, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Tempio v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by39 opinions
- The Matter of James R. Diegelman v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- Krieger v. City of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 2013
- Vargas v. Crown Container Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Ciapa v. MissoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- LaLima v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.