Legal Opinion

Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1938No. 2991PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McVICAR, District Judge.

This is a suit to restrain the defendant from prosecuting three suits brought by it in other districts, to rescind a contract between the parties made June 20, 1927; or in lieu thereof, to determine the amount due plaintiff under said contract and for other relief.

June 30, 1923, Abram P. Steckel made application for a patent for the rolling of thin sheet metal. In pursuance to this application, a patent was issued October 21, 1930, No. 1,779,195. This patent was assigned to the plaintiff. April 20, 1926, Big-gert and Johnson made application for a patent on the same…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Kaufmann v. LiggettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. Stuart v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Dunmore v. PaddenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  5. Cold Metal Process Co. v. UNITED STATES ENG. & FOUNDRY CO.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  3. Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  4. Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Steward v. Atlantic Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API