Legal Opinion

Goettel v. Glenn Berry Mfrs., Inc.

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided December 21, 1964No. Civ. 6069PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

Upon consideration of the Motion to Remand filed herein by the plaintiffs and the brief submitted in support thereof and opposition thereto, the Court finds said motion should be denied.

This is an action brought pursuant to Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b), as amended, hereinafter referred to as the Act, to recover back wages. Such an action under the Act may be brought originally either in State or Federal court by the terms of the Act, to-wit:

“Action to recover such liability may be maintained in any court of competent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Bradley v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1951

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Russell v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  2. Lockard v. Equifax, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  3. Haun v. Retail Credit Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Hill v. Moss-American, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1970
  5. Olson v. REMBRANDT PRINTING COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API