Legal Opinion

Dennison v. City of Phoenix

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 9, 2009No. 07-35251Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Mark Dennison appeals the district court’s denial of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim. Dennison alleges that the termination of his employment as a police officer from the City of Phoenix (Oregon) Police Department (“Police Department”) without opportunity for a hearing violated his right to due process. The district court granted summary judgment for appellees, the City of Phoenix (“City”) and Chief of Police Robert Kershaw, and remanded Dennison’s remaining state claims to state court. We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, see Simkins v. NevadaCare, Inc.,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Papadopoulos v. Oregon State Board of Higher EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  2. Ruby Simkins M&k Enterprises v. Nevadacare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. David Koepping v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon Jerry WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API