Legal Opinion

Curley v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1992PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff commenced an action against his employer Consolidated Rail Corp. (Conrail), pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 USC § 51 et seq.), to recover damages for injuries sustained while he was driving one of Conrail’s vehicles. After a jury trial, a judgment and verdict was rendered in plaintiff’s favor.

The Appellate Division modified, on the law, vacating the judgment and verdict and dismissing the complaint, on the ground that plaintiff had not satisfied the standard of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ToopsSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ojeda v. MTACourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
  2. Poole v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Pidgeon v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Stephens v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Mazzella v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API