Legal Opinion

Fanning v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 29, 1915No. 6599PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Accusation of keeping disorderly house; from city court of Washington — Judge Wynne.' May 1, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtWade, J.

Section 383 of the Penal Code declares that “Any person who shall keep and maintain, either by himself or others, a common, ill-governed, and disorderly house, to the encouragement of idleness, gaming, drinking, or other misbehavior, or to the common disturbance of the neighborhood or orderly citizens, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.” The following general definition of the term “disorderly house” is given: “A disorderly house is a house in which people abide or to which they resort to the disturbance of the neighborhood or for purposes which are injurious to the public morals, health,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thrower v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Heard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Garvin v. Mayor of WaynesboroCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  4. Palfus v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1867

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ballenger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  2. McBrayer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  3. Wood v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  4. Hammock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  5. Kinney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API