Legal Opinion

Nixa Ramos v. Roche Products, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 21, 1991No. 90-2107PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a consolidated action in which plaintiffs-appellants Julie Rossy and Nixa Ramos have respectively alleged sexual discrimination and retaliation in violation of Section 704(a) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e to 20006-17. 1

In August of 1988 the district court, after dismissing plaintiffs’ claims of racial animus brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and striking their request for a jury trial, dismissed their state law claims as time-barred and Ramos’ sex discrimination claim for failure to exhaust administrative…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. School Union No. 37 v. United National InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  3. Hernandez-Torres v. Intercontinental Trading, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  4. Francis A. Willhauck, Jr. v. Paul HalpinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  5. Hoeppner v. Crotched Mountain Rehabilitation Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API