Legal Opinion

Leiseth v. Fred Meyer, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 13, 2002No. 9809-06891; A109991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

Plaintiffs, on separate occasions at separate Fred Meyer department stores, purchased merchandise and attempted to leave the stores. When four of the five plaintiffs attempted to leave the stores, an “electronic article surveillance” alarm went off and Fred Meyer employees stopped plaintiffs to determine if they had paid for their merchandise. They had. A Fred Meyer employee stopped the fifth plaintiff after he had left the store and asked him for a receipt showing that he had paid for food items that he consumed while in the store. A cashier confirmed that plaintiff paid for the items.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. Barbo MacHinery Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Lukas v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Roberts v. Mitchell Bros. Truck LinesOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Holland v. Sisters of Saint Joseph of PeaceOregon Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Benjamin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. State v. VanderzandenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API