Legal Opinion · Dissent
THE LEAGUE OF WOMEN Voters of etc. v. Ken Detzner And Pam Bondi
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 1, 2014No. 1D14-3953Published
1DissentMakar, J.
Our emergency three-judge panel has been asked to certify the trial court’s order in this pending appeal — one that is unquestionably of “great public importance” — to “require immediate resolution by the supreme' court.” Art. V, § 3(b)(5), Fla. Const. ■ Because this case does not “require immediate resolution” by our supreme court, I cannot join in the panel’s certification.
The phrase “require immediate resolution” has two operative components: “require” and “immediate resolution.” Read together, they include only those cases 'with' such an obviously urgent need for a truly immediate and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bush v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Carawan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Smith v. Coalition to Reduce Class SizeSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Gore v. HarrisSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Harris v. Coalition to Reduce Class SizeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.