Commonwealth v. Hallowell
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
The Court being equally divided, the Order is affirmed.
NIX, J., filed an Opinion in Support of Affirmance. LARSEN and KAUFFMAN, JJ., filed an Opinion in Support of Affirmance. O’BRIEN, C. J., filed an Opinion in Support of Reversal in which ROBERTS and FLAHERTY, JJ., join. ROBERTS, J., filed an Opinion in Support of Reversal in which O’BRIEN, C. J., and FLAHERTY, J.; join.
OPINION IN SUPPORT OF AFFIRMANCE
NIX, Justice.
Because of the error committed in the first trial, appellant has been awarded a new trial. The error was not of the nature that would taint a retrial, thus the award of a new…
3Cases cited31 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SimonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. HewlettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. RafalkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. SimonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. SimonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.