Petroleum Midway Co., Ltd. v. Moynier
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
This proceeding was instituted to require the respondents Marius and Adrienne Moynier, husband and wife, and appellants Emile and Marie Moynier, husband and wife, and Abel and Jerondine Moynier, husband and wife, to interplead as to their respective rights in certain royalties received from the operation of oil-wells drilled upon lands heyonging to said respondent Marius Moynier. Both the appellants and respondents appeared in said action, and by proper and appropriate pleadings set forth their respective claims to said royalties. Respondents contended that they were the owners of and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Burrows v. Petroleum Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lankford v. TombariWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Coley v. WolcottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Wilbur D. May v. Nevada Irrigation District, an Irrigation District Organized and Existing Under the Laws of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Clark v. Elsinore Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Riverside Rancho Corp. v. CowanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.