Legal Opinion

Bolden v. Sheriff

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1977No. 9384PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*9OPINION

2Per curiam

Brenda Faye Bolden was charged with, and, at the conclusion of a preliminary examination, ordered to stand trial for, selling a controlled substance in violation of Nev. Rev. Stat. § 453.-321 and 453.171. She then filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in which her central contention was that there was insufficient evidence produced at the preliminary examination to establish probable cause that she committed the charged offense. The district judge considered and rejected the petition and Bolden has appealed, reasserting the same contention.

The record establishes that a Las Vegas…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Glosen v. Sheriff of Washoe CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  2. DuFrane v. Sheriff, Washoe CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Zampanti v. Sheriff of Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Waid v. SheriffNevada Supreme Court · 1972

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Paige v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  2. FIGUEROA-BELTRAN VS. U.S. OF AMERICA (NRAP 5)Nevada Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Sheriff, Clark County v. ByronNevada Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API