Legal Opinion · Dissent

Slaton State Bank v. Amarillo Nat. Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 3, 1926No. 2712. [fn*]Published

1Dissent

I concur with the majority in the holding that the trial court did not err in overruling the Slaton bank's plea of privilege, but I find myself unable to agree with Judge RANDOLPH in the disposition made of the case, as well as some of the propositions of law announced, and as applied to the uncontroverted facts disclosed by the record.

Judge RANDOLPH'S opinion fully and fairly states the issues tendered by the plaintiff's petition, but does not sufficiently set out the defendant's defenses. So I will make no further statement of the plaintiff's pleadings, but will give the substance of the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Commercial & Agricultural Bank v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Grand Fraternity v. MeltonTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Pledger v. Business Men's Accident Ass'n of TexasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  4. People's Trust Co. v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Cole v. BammelTexas Supreme Court · 1884

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API