Louisville Coal & Coke Co. v. Pocahontas Co.
Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati
1Opinion of the Court
By the act of 52 O. L., 34, this court is given jurisdiction of actions brought against a non-resident of this state or a foreign corporation where property of or debts owing to the defendant may be found in the city of Cincinnati.
These suits are brought against a foreign corporation, and the primary question involved in these motions arises upon the validity and effect of a garnishment served upon a partnership composed of non-resident partners doing business within the jurisdiction of the court, in suits for money.
It may be premised as a cardinal principle that the jurisdiction of the court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Willcox & Gibbs Sewing MacHine Co. v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Cushman v. SnowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Barnes Safe & Lock Co. v. Bloch Bros. Tobacco Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
- Johnson v. CampbellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Haebler v. LuttgenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.