Legal Opinion

Louisville Coal & Coke Co. v. Pocahontas Co.

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Decided July 1, 1907Published

1Opinion of the Court

By the act of 52 O. L., 34, this court is given jurisdiction of actions brought against a non-resident of this state or a foreign corporation where property of or debts owing to the defendant may be found in the city of Cincinnati.

These suits are brought against a foreign corporation, and the primary question involved in these motions arises upon the validity and effect of a garnishment served upon a partnership composed of non-resident partners doing business within the jurisdiction of the court, in suits for money.

It may be premised as a cardinal principle that the jurisdiction of the court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Willcox & Gibbs Sewing MacHine Co. v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Cushman v. SnowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  3. Barnes Safe & Lock Co. v. Bloch Bros. Tobacco Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Johnson v. CampbellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  5. Haebler v. LuttgenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API